The negative effects of too much sugar are well documented. As a result of this, a commentary published in NatureÂ asserts that sugar is just as toxic as tobacco and alcohol, and the government should step in to regulate its consumption.
The United Nations pegged alcohol, tobacco, and diet as some of the largest factors causing the 35 million deaths that occur each year as a result of these diseases. According to report authors Robert H. Lustig, Laura A. Schmidt, and Claire D. Brindis, two are regulated by the government, â€œleaving one of the primary culprits behind this worldwide health crisis unchecked.â€
The report also mentions that sugar consumption has tripled around the world in the past 50 years, a large contributor to the obesity epidemic. Apparently there are 30% more obese people in the world than there are malnourished people. Thatâ€™s an unsettling statistic.
If youâ€™re wondering how sugar can compare to these non-food items that affect the way our minds and bodies work, itâ€™s pretty easy to figure out. Sugar can be toxic, because there is potential for abuse, and excessive amounts of it can negatively affect public health. So many processed foods have sugar added right in that many people eat as many as 500 calories a day in added sugar alone, many without even realizing. Aside from this, apparently sugar triggers the same areas of the brain as alcohol and tobacco, encouraging excessive intake and cravings.
Itâ€™s easy to peg obesity as the main cause of these diseases, but the report shines light on the fact that people within a healthy weight range are also developing hypertension, diabetes, heart and liver disease, and lipid problems. Because of this, the authors believe itâ€™s time for the government to step in and impose taxes, age restrictions, and other policies to control the distribution and consumption of sugar.
The Sugar Association obviously had a thing or two to say in response to the researchers claims, saying the sugar consumption rates listed in the report were based on â€œincomplete science.â€
“We are confident that the American people are perfectly capable of choosing what foods to eat without stark regulations and unreasonable bans imposed upon them,” the association said in a statement.
Hmm, it sounds like diet-related disease statistics are telling us otherwise, what do you think?
When all the facts about each product (tobacco, alcohol, sugar) are simplified and looked at from an objective perspective, it doesnâ€™t sound like too much of a stretch to compare the three, does it? Do you think this would be going too far, or would you be happy to see government restrictions on sugar?Â I wouldn’t mind seeing this, even if grade schools are tackled first, to limit the amount of sugar consumed by children.