≡ Menu

Sustainable Energy Transition Happening Faster Than Expected

Sustainable Energy Transition Happening Faster Than Expected post image

In this post I’ll continue one of my regular themes: optimism about a faster than expected transition away from fossil fuels and combustion-engine cars. I ran across this recent PV Magazine article, “The age of plenty on steroids”, which is a report from the recent BNEF Future of Energy Summit in New York. It details why Michael Liebreich, the founder of BNEF (Bloomberg New Energy Finance) thinks there are many reasons to be optimistic about the future of energy, despite climate change, and the emerging political situations in the US and Europe. Granted, he does have a vested business interest in being optimistic about a fast-paced energy transition, but that doesn’t make him wrong. He is certainly not alone in his analysis, and he backs his position with data.

Liebreich notes that, even with the Trump administration’s “strange fetish for coal”, the transition to sustainable energy is indeed occurring faster than anyone expected. He points out that 2016 was another year in which Western economies grew but emissions did not. From 2006 to 2016 the United States shifted from just 3% non-hydro renewable energy to 9%. Similarly, China progressed from 6% to 10%, and some EU countries have already reached 25% or more.

Liebriech points out the due to the earlier than expected widespread success of wind and solar, some issues are emerging that were not expected until 2025 to 2030. In some places, concerns regarding grid integration of high spot penetrations of renewable energy are no longer theoretical in 2017. In the future even massive amounts of energy storage (batteries) could sometimes be overwhelmed by the variability and volatility of wind in particular. It will mean huge ramp rates and require robust interconnectivity between grids to resolve. The fact that these kinds of issues have arrived much earlier than expected is not a necessarily bad thing.

Liebriech is also optimistic about the uptake of electric cars. While just 1 in 500 new cars is electric now, BNEF has predicted that 35-47% of new cars will be electric by 2040. Liebriech maintains that once the sticker prices of electric cars become lower than the equivalent combustion-engine cars, we “will see 40% market shift in any country in the world”. 

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • David Ivory

    Some are skeptical about one aspect of Bloomberg’s optimism – the increase in GDP becoming decoupled from emissions. The argument goes like this: -Globalisation is masking the carbon emissions for developed economies as production moves to developing economies.

    However there is cause for optimism here as the decoupling is not just some countries – it appears to be global. See here: –

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/14/is-it-possible-to-reduce-co2-emissions-and-grow-the-global-economy

    This is good news – and it plays to the notion that the ‘Limits to Growth’ crowd are wrong. Growth is not just about resource use in a world where services are an increasing proportion of GDP.

  • http://www.the9billion.com/ John Johnston

    Thanks David, No doubt resource use is a factor, especially when the world population has climbed from 7 billion to 7.5 billion in less than 6 years, but not the only one. Increasing efficiency of resource use is certainly going to be an issue in the 21st century – food, water, and energy in particular.

    The “limits to growth” discussion is an interesting one, too. Obviously the human population cannot expand infinitely on a planet with finite resources. Then the optimistic “abundance” crowd point out that eventually humans will not have to be limited to one planet (planning for asteroid mining is already well underway), and problems like climate change will be resolved with abundant clean energy sooner than people currently realise (citing the exponential growth of technologies such as solar power and nanotechnology). Then we have the technological singularity crowd pointing out that AI will exceed human intelligence as soon as 2030, so we just don’t know what will happen or be possible after that.

  • http://www.wen.yihuanghou.com/ 衣皇后

    衣皇后:

    百万张美女套图,上万部美女视频,一键转存,打包下载:

    http://www.wen.yihuanghou.com/

    衣皇后,等你来!

  • http://www.wo.zengda.xin/ 增达网

    增达网:
    ——————————
    终生只需99元,让百万人每天浏览你的广告,每次浏览十秒时间。

    终生只需99元,免费下载群发软件,无使用限制,全部是破解版。

    终生只需99元,让你什么不干躺着就赚钱,上线替下线发展会员。
    ——————————
    群发软件免费下,无限广告免费发,

    百万流量免费享,十级提成免费拿。
    ——————————
    注册网址:

    http://www.wo.zengda.xin/
    ——————————
    免费会员,不花钱,照样赚
    ——————————

  • http://www.wo.zengda.xin/ 增达网

    增达网:
    ——————————
    终生只需99元,让百万人每天浏览你的广告,每次浏览十秒时间。

    终生只需99元,免费下载群发软件,无使用限制,全部是破解版。

    终生只需99元,让你什么不干躺着就赚钱,上线替下线发展会员。
    ——————————
    群发软件免费下,无限广告免费发,

    百万流量免费享,十级提成免费拿。
    ——————————
    注册网址:

    http://www.wo.zengda.xin/
    ——————————

  • http://www.walker307.yihuanghou.com/ 衣皇后

    很荣幸来到这里参观!

  • http://www.yifang.zengda.xin/ 增达网

    送你千万幅春景,春景艳艳美心间。送你美丽的春天,春天洒满友谊篇!

  • http://www.qhy3703.zengda.xin/ 增达网

    增达网:

    终生只需99元,让百万人每天浏览你的广告,每次浏览十秒时间。

    终生只需99元,免费下载群发软件,无使用限制,全部是破解版。

    终生只需99元,让你什么不干躺着就赚钱,上线替下线发展会员。

    注册网址:

    http://www.qhy3703.zengda.xin/

    婕斯Grace团队

    联系电话:13928419356

    QQ号:993333268

  • http://www.2752383889.zengda.xin/ 2752383889

    好好学习,天天向上

  • http://www.356688.com/ 直销

    好几年没用过博客了,支持下!

  • http://www.2068201105.zengda.ren/ 增达网QQ-2068201105

    没玩过博客,感觉还挺好玩!

  • http://www.yao1234528.356688.com/ 增达网

    增达网:

    逆向网赚,上线替下线赚钱,什么不干,坐收四十万。

    ①,让百万人每天浏览你的广告,每次浏览十秒时间。

    ②,免费下载营销软件,无使用限制,全部是破解版。

    ③,逆向推荐模式,自动下滑,上线替下线发展会员。

    详情登陆会员区查看。注册网址:

    http://www.yao1234528.356688.com/

    联系QQ-435799780

    凡我下线升级VIP立返人民币30元,不升级勿扰!

  • http://www.cxb.356688.com/ 网赚

    这个不错哦,我好好读读!

  • http://www.liangshuai.356688.com/ 增达网

    看看你的博客,也是一种娱乐!

  • M98987

    What? It doesn’t disprove limits to growth at all.
    That was a carbon based argument. As in, drilling 100 miles down in the Gulf of Mexico would be non-sustainable and non-economic.

    That you’d need sustainable/non-polluting energy sources to replace those dirty carbon sources.

    Fracking production costs are increasing today even as more fracking comes on line.